News
On August 29, 2022, Boyden Gray & Associates partner Jonathan Berry argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. SEC. The case involves a challenge to the SEC’s endorsement of a new ...
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit quoted an amicus brief by Boyden Gray & Associates on behalf of a group of First Amendment scholars in an opinion that upholds the right of religious schools to structure their communities in accordance ...
Former White House Counsel C. Boyden Gray and Michael Buschbacher, counsel at Boyden Gray & Associates, published an editorial in The Wall Street Journal on August 7 urging West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin to continue his push to secure meaningful reforms to ...
A recent article by Pamela King of E&E News discusses the origins of the major questions doctrine clarified by the Court in its recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA. In West Virginia, the Court considered the legal theory at the heart of the Clean ...
A recent article by Kevin Stocklin published in The Epoch Times discusses the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA for other regulatory initiatives by the Biden Administration. In West Virginia, the Court considered whether ...
Boyden Gray & Associates has filed opening and reply briefs in Consumers' Research and Cause Based Commerce's challenge of the FCC's Universal Service Fund.
Section 254 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 established the Universal Service Fund and delegated ...
A recent article by Lesley Clark and Niina Farah of E&E News discusses the implications of the Supreme Court's recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA on three major climate rules.
In West Virginia , the Court considered the legality of the Clean Power ...
Rupert Darwall collected some of the most prominent comments made on the SEC's proposed climate-related risk disclosures rule, highlighting many of the arguments in support of and opposition to the proposed rule. Darwall explains:
Much comment on the controversial ...
Amicus briefs filed by Boyden Gray & Associates tracked the reasoning in two recent Supreme Court decisions: West Virginia v. EPA and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Court considered the legality of the Clean Power ...
The Fifth Circuit granted Boyden Gray & Associates' petition for en banc rehearing in Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, which challenges President Biden's 2021 executive order requiring federal workers to receive a COVID-19 vaccine or face termination.
In ...
The Supreme Court has denied the petition for certiorari in Byrd v. Lamb, which asked whether a Bivens claim is applicable when a Department of Homeland Security agent displays his firearm in a public parking lot. The Fifth Circuit declined to recognize ...
Boyden Gray & Associates filed comments on the SEC's proposed rule on “The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors” 87 Fed. Reg. at 21,334, arguing that the proposed rule would be illegal and unconstitutional.
The proposed ...
On August 29, 2022, Boyden Gray & Associates partner Jonathan Berry argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. SEC. The case involves a challenge to the SEC’s endorsement of a new ...
The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit quoted an amicus brief by Boyden Gray & Associates on behalf of a group of First Amendment scholars in an opinion that upholds the right of religious schools to structure their communities in accordance ...
Former White House Counsel C. Boyden Gray and Michael Buschbacher, counsel at Boyden Gray & Associates, published an editorial in The Wall Street Journal on August 7 urging West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin to continue his push to secure meaningful reforms to ...
A recent article by Pamela King of E&E News discusses the origins of the major questions doctrine clarified by the Court in its recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA. In West Virginia, the Court considered the legal theory at the heart of the Clean ...
A recent article by Kevin Stocklin published in The Epoch Times discusses the implications of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA for other regulatory initiatives by the Biden Administration. In West Virginia, the Court considered whether ...
Boyden Gray & Associates has filed opening and reply briefs in Consumers' Research and Cause Based Commerce's challenge of the FCC's Universal Service Fund.
Section 254 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 established the Universal Service Fund and delegated ...
A recent article by Lesley Clark and Niina Farah of E&E News discusses the implications of the Supreme Court's recent decision in West Virginia v. EPA on three major climate rules.
In West Virginia , the Court considered the legality of the Clean Power ...
Rupert Darwall collected some of the most prominent comments made on the SEC's proposed climate-related risk disclosures rule, highlighting many of the arguments in support of and opposition to the proposed rule. Darwall explains:
Much comment on the controversial ...
Amicus briefs filed by Boyden Gray & Associates tracked the reasoning in two recent Supreme Court decisions: West Virginia v. EPA and Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
In West Virginia v. EPA, the Court considered the legality of the Clean Power ...
The Fifth Circuit granted Boyden Gray & Associates' petition for en banc rehearing in Feds for Medical Freedom v. Biden, which challenges President Biden's 2021 executive order requiring federal workers to receive a COVID-19 vaccine or face termination.
In ...
The Supreme Court has denied the petition for certiorari in Byrd v. Lamb, which asked whether a Bivens claim is applicable when a Department of Homeland Security agent displays his firearm in a public parking lot. The Fifth Circuit declined to recognize ...
Boyden Gray & Associates filed comments on the SEC's proposed rule on “The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors” 87 Fed. Reg. at 21,334, arguing that the proposed rule would be illegal and unconstitutional.
The proposed ...